science – FREE RANGE THINKER

HELLO FREE THINKERS

As I have previously written, this site is very controversial. I am not here to change your mind, but instead get you to think for yourself, even if you have made up your mind. It never hurts to see things from a different angle and then use critical thinking to achieve a better result in one’s life. But you choose.

Onward we go…

Topic: Observations of our world today.

What will this world be like for our grandkids, great-grandkids, and future generations beyond? Will there be fake plants, fake animals, fake food, and more? Will this be an industrial planet run by AI? Will life as we know it exist at all?

Right now, we are on the brink of losing all that is natural. People are killing the planet with chemtrails; known to be a term that people claim is a conspiracy theory. But if you call it by its new name, the so-called professionals use, Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (S.A.I), then, hey, now it is OK.

Why are we allowing certain people and governments to do their worst to our food, air, and even all the life on this planet by using GMO’s, dangerous pesticides, SAI, fake lab-grown meat/food, vaccines, and more?

Slashing rainforests so delegates can have a road on their way to a summit to ”save the planet,” where they think they are more important than really doing anything to save the Earth. Somehow, I think they think the Earth will fix itself. It might, when we stop hurting and destroying it.

Then we have the space program to see if life can be sustained on Mars or even the moon, instead of focusing on the fact that we have such a variety and diverse amount of life on Earth. What makes certain people think that we can inhabit another planet if this one is destroyed by humans? Bugging out to another planet once this one is destroyed by humans will only cause them to do the same thing there.

Consider all the life forms that came before humans…dinosaurs and the like. For millions of years, they walked this Earth, never doing any damage to it like what humans have done in their short existence.

Then humans create a god, thinking that this god thought making humans in its image was a great thing to do. But, yet, what became of the dinosaurs? Some think a comet/asteroid fell from the sky and wiped out all the dinosaurs. But what then? Suddenly, a god appears and creates humans? Any superior being would not make such a destructive species like a human.

Humans have yet to evolve past a barbaric juvenile form of life. They are cruel, heartless killers who seem to think this is proper behavior given to them by their beliefs. Some may be kind, others, in today’s lifestyle, think they can willfully murder their pre-born baby without a care. Some take the lives of defenseless animals in hunting, calling the murder of these defenseless creatures a sport.

There are some good and many bad people nowadays. I do not make that statement lightly, but it is an observational fact. Watch the news out of a big city, and one can see the brutality and destruction of what humans are doing to one another.

There is good, there is bad, and there are proper morals as well. But who decides what proper morals are these days? I suppose whatever you believe in would be what is considered proper.

Today, the definition of proper morals appears to have shifted. Modern society regards actions such as abortion, teaching sexual topics to young children in the classroom, and publicly criticizing those with opposing viewpoints as acceptable. (Florida officials pressure schools to roll back sex ed lessons on contraception and consent, 2024)

The values I learned in my youth focused on basic manners—like saying “please,” “thank you,” and “excuse me”—and a proper education in subjects like math, English, science, history, music, art, and gymnastics. Not anything related to sex, CRT, DEI, or LGBT.

Now, it seems that discussions of adults’ sexual identities are being introduced to children in ways as extreme and confusing. With so many so-called, ‘’new norms’’ replacing traditional teachings, I question how these changes will impact the future, especially given the current state of social debate and cognitive dissonance.

Nature gives us so much, and what do we do? We find ways to destroy it. We are given life, water, air, plants, food, pets, wildlife, and more. And yet, these things are not cherished but rather abused, taken for granted as if we have some right to destroy what gifts we have been given without thought or feeling.

Then I think of how our bodies work all on their own. Do we think of our organs daily? Of course not, as they function on their own. We do control our breathing and our movements, however. But we do not control our organs like the liver, heart, kidneys, and such. We just take for granted they will function no matter the onslaught we do to them, like eating improperly, injecting toxins, drinking alcohol, doing drugs, and more. We do to ourselves what we do to our planet. Where is the appreciation?

Do any of us really understand the meaning of appreciation? And do we know how to apply it?

Appreciation- noun: A recognition of worth, thankfulness.

How do we apply it, you may wonder. Well, we can apply it by showing respect for our planet by not chopping down rainforests, sinking islands for their sand, polluting our air with the spraying of toxic chemicals, and by not creating GMOs, or lab-grown meat, etc.

And to appreciate and respect our body by eating clean, limiting alcohol consumption, staying away from lethal street drugs, not injecting ourselves with toxic ingredients, and more.

But I do digress into preaching. Not by intent. Just an observation of what we go through in our daily lives of struggles.

So many things are thrown into our laps these days that are not of our making, but rather the issues of politicians and those of others who go along with specific ideologies.

We can do better by thinking for ourselves, questioning it all, and basically not going along with anything until we understand all the angles involved.

Critical thinking is important, as is common sense, and we must practice this with all the struggles of today. It is vitally important for the future of generations to come.

HELLO FREE THINKERS

Welcome! You are about to embark on a journey that will free your mind from the toxicity of a one-sided environment.

We will provide you with thought-provoking opinions, viewpoints, comments, insights, and perspectives from diverse backgrounds and age groups.

Our aim is not only to show different viewpoints but also to spark curiosity. We strive to inspire deeper discussions that can enrich your understanding of the topic(s) at hand, in hopes that it will encourage critical thinking

Thank you for joining the journey and freeing your mind.

Well, kids, I am back. Did you miss me? I had a lot of issues that required my attention, but onward we go.

We last left off with a very controversial topic: vaccines! Oy vey,oy vah, oy veh, right? 🙂 Let’s continue.

The last segment was about Edward Jenner and his innovative idea for vaccines. We can look further into him, but he isn’t the only one who decided to go with the vaccine narrative. We can break it down vaccine by vaccine and who invented which one, but that seems rather tedious. But if I must, I will, as it is very important to know who did what and why.

Let’s look at the smallpox vaccine. According to ‘A Guide to Health’ by Mahatma Gandhi, ”Vaccination is a barbarous practice, and it is one of the most fatal of all the delusions current in our time, not to be found even among the so-called savage races of the world. Its supporters are not content with its adoption by those who have no objection to it, but seek to impose it with the aid of penal laws and rigorous punishments on all people alike.

The practice of vaccination is not very old, dating as it does only from 1798 A.D. But, during this comparatively short period that has elapsed, millions have fallen a prey to the delusion that those who get themselves vaccinated are safe from the attack of smallpox. No one can say that smallpox will necessarily attack those who have not been vaccinated; for many cases have been observed of unvaccinated people being free from its attack.

The fact that some people who are not vaccinated do get the disease, we cannot, of course, conclude that they would have been immune if only they had gotten themselves vaccinated.

Moreover, vaccination is a very dirty process, for the serum, which is introduced into the human body includes not only that of the cow, but also of the actual smallpox patient. An average man would even vomit at the mere sight of this stuff. If the hand happens to touch it, it is always washed with soap. The mere suggestion of tasting it fills us with indignation and disgust. But how few of those who get themselves vaccinated realise that they are, in effect, eating this filthy stuff!

Most people know that, in several diseases, medicines and liquid food are injected into the blood, and that they are assimilated into the system more rapidly than if they were taken through the mouth. The only difference, in fact, between injection and the ordinary process of eating through the mouth is that the assimilation in the former case is instantaneous, while that in the latter is slow. And yet we do not shrink from getting ourselves vaccinated! As has been well said, cowards die a living death, and our craze for vaccination is solely due to the fear of death or disfigurement by smallpox.

The vaccine is a filthy substance, and it is foolish to expect that one kind of filth can be removed by another.”

So there you have Gandhi’s observational fact, or opinion if you so choose.

Later we will continue with other notations/observations of how this practice of vaccines is nothing more than a cash cow for those who make them.

For now, consider this approach by Gandhi and think for yourself what it could mean to you.

Farewell for now, FREETHINKERS. I shall leave you to your thoughts.

HELLO FREE THINKERS

Welcome! You are about to embark on a journey that will free your mind from the toxicity of a one-sided environment.

We will give you thought-provoking opinions, viewpoints, comments, insights, and perspectives from various walks of life and ages.

Our aim is not only to show different viewpoints but also to spark curiosity. We strive to inspire deeper discussions that can enrich your understanding of the topics at hand, in hopes that it will encourage critical thinking

Thank you for joining the journey and freeing your mind.

Since my last few chapters were not happy for most, I will continue with very controversial topics. Why? Because too many are just rolling over and accepting the narrative without question. So, with that being said, I am going to write about, oh wait for it, that dreaded topic…vaccines! Oooh, me oh my, what will people think? Oh, wait, that’s the point, ”to think”.

VACCINES.

Well, where to begin. Ah, yes, the way back history machine of how they all began. Did it all begin with Edward Jenner (1749-1823) in 1796? He was an English scientist and physician after all. But was he even a real scientist?

Jenner was an active Freemason (serving in 1812 as master of the Royal Lodges of Faith and Friendship, NO 270) and Philosopher. Originally trained as a surgeon, Jenner’s interest in natural science led him to study under prominent figures, including the renowned surgeon John Hunter.

At age 13, he became an apprentice to Daniel Ludlow, a competent surgeon trained in London. Jenner studied books on anatomy, helped with simple operations, and participated in dissecting animals to improve his knowledge of anatomy.

At 18, Jenner had acquired enough skills to help him assist Ludlow in more complicated surgeries and to attend to and treat patients by himself.

In 1770, he went to London to study with the most prominent surgeon, John Hunter. Jenner studied anatomy and surgery with Hunter at St George’s Hospital for 2 years and helped him with dissection.

In 1771, he was asked to accompany Captain James Cook as a naturalist but declined the offer and returned to Gloucestershire in 1772, where he assumed the duties of a country doctor instead.

While still practising with his medical interests, Jenner continued his observations of nature by contributing to the natural science literature.

In 1785, Jenner observed that his old friend and teacher, John Hunter, exhibited all the symptoms of progressive angina (angina was considered incurable at that time). In 1793, Hunter passed away from ossification of the coronary arteries of the heart. Soon after his friend’s death, Jenner returned to Gloucestershire and began his medical career.

During his time as a medical practitioner, Jenner began the observations and experimentations that would lead to the discovery, some twenty-five years later, of the principle of vaccination.

However, the principle of inoculation goes further back to ancient times in India and China. They would introduce matter from the pustules of a person with an active case of smallpox into the skin of a person to be immunized from the disease. Then the person who was inoculated would usually contract a milder case of smallpox. At least that was the theory behind a vaccine. However, the inoculation, often performed on children, resulted in death.

Knowing this, Jenner moved forward with practising vaccination on his child many times over, resulting in the child being ill for life. He then inoculated eight-year-old James Phipps on May 14, 1796, with cowpox serum using material obtained from a pustule on the hand of a milkmaid who had contracted cowpox, without success.

Contrary to this horrific practice, they knew how to cure smallpox in the 17th century. The famous Dr. Thomas Sydenham, of England(1624-89), developed a new treatment that reduced the death rate from about 50 percent to 1 percent or 2 percent.

According to Abram Hoffer, MD, PhD, “I don’t think there’s been any major shift in the medical profession’s general approach to new ideas. I don’t think there ever will be that kind of wholesale change. Three hundred years ago, when the major disease was smallpox, Sir Thomas Sydenham developed a new treatment that reduced the death rate from about 50 percent to 1 percent or 2 percent. His reward? He was being challenged to a duel. The English Medical Association wanted to drive him out. He wrote: “A new idea is like a sapling in the middle of a road, and if it’s not fenced in, it will be galloped over by the trampling hordes.” That’s a really great statement, and it’s also my view of what happens to medical discovery.”

At this point, I will stop, as this has been a lot to absorb. Meaning, it takes quite a bit of thought to undo what has been viewed as a ”life-saving preventive” for a great many years.

However, there will be many more chapters to come, as this is one vast topic that goes way back. So, reader, get ready to think for yourself.

Thanks for choosing to be a Free thinker.