HELLO FREE THINKERS

Life is a complex journey, and the choices we make pave the way to extraordinary experiences. Embracing creativity, curiosity, and courage is essential for a fulfilling adventure.

Welcome to a realm of endless possibilities, where the journey is just as exciting as the destination. Every moment presents an opportunity to leave your mark on the canvas of existence. The only limit is the breadth of your imagination.

Critical thinking: Always be in doubt and check it out. In other words, think for yourself. Ask questions.

We continue forward with our last conversation—

I’ve noticed that not many people really read in-depth about these topics; instead, they often skim through brief snippets on social media. Many rely solely on their doctor’s advice, while others may have lingering questions, yet don’t delve into the essential information. For instance, let’s think critically: when in real life does anyone encounter 15 or 23 different strains of pneumonia simultaneously? So, why would we consider injecting such an enormous number of strains along with a host of questionable ingredients and consider this ”safe and effective”? It demands a closer examination.

It would seem that the overall perception is that they will trust their doctor. They tend to believe what Big Pharma, the CDC, and the FDA communicate, assuming that these organizations are responsible for conducting the research, testing, and manufacturing of medications.

Without further ado, I leave you this list of ingredients, so you can decide if these are ”safe and effective” for the human body. Oh, and maybe ask for the list of ingredients (package insert) at the doctor’s office along with the Vaccine Information Sheet (VIS), which is required by federal law to be given for each and every vaccine that one gets.

In addition to weakened or killed disease antigens (viruses or bacteria), vaccines contain very small amounts of other
ingredients – excipients or media.

Some excipients are added to a vaccine for a specific purpose. These include:
Preservatives, to prevent contamination. For example, thimerosal.
Adjuvants, to help stimulate a stronger immune response. For example, aluminum salts.
Stabilizers, to keep the vaccine potent during transportation and storage. For example, sugars or gelatin.

Others are residual trace amounts of materials that were used during the manufacturing process and removed. These include:
Cell culture materials, used to grow the vaccine antigens. For example, egg protein, various culture media.
Inactivating ingredients, used to kill viruses or inactivate toxins. For example, formaldehyde.
Antibiotics, used to prevent contamination by bacteria. For example, neomycin.

The following table lists all components, other than antigens, shown in the manufacturers’ package insert (PI) for each vaccine.
Each of these PIs, which can be found on the FDA’s website (see below), contains a description of that vaccine’s manufacturing
process, including the amount and purpose of each substance.

All information was extracted from manufacturers’ package inserts.

If in doubt about whether a PI has been updated since this table was prepared, check the FDA’s website at:
http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm093833.htm

A table listing vaccine excipients and media by excipient is published by the Institute for Vaccine Safety
at Johns Hopkins University, and can be found at http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/components-Excipients.htm.

Updates:

Trumenba: (added Aluminum phosphate)
RotaTeq: PI dated 2/2017
Rotarix: 6/11/18 (PI dated xx/xxxx)
Smallpox: 3/2018
Td (Tenivac): April 2013
Td (Mass Biologics): April 2009 (no change)
Tdap (Adacel): xxx/2017 (no change)
Tdap (Boostrix): 6/12/2018 (PI dated xx/xxxx) (no change)
Typhim Vi: March 2014 (added sodium chloride & buffered saline)
Ty21a: September 2013
Varicella Frozen: 2/2017
Varicella Refrigerator Stable: 2/2017
YF Vax: June 2016
Zostivax Frozen: xx/2018
Zostivax Refrigerator Stable: xx/2018
Shingrix: 10/2017

HELLO FREE THINKERS


Welcome! You are about to embark on a journey that will free your mind from the toxicity of a one-sided environment.

We will provide you with thought-provoking opinions, viewpoints, comments, insights, and perspectives from diverse backgrounds and age groups.

Our aim is not only to show different viewpoints but also to spark curiosity. We strive to inspire deeper discussions that can enrich your understanding of the topic(s) at hand, in hopes that it will encourage critical thinking

Thank you for joining the journey and freeing your mind.


We last left off with a very controversial topic: vaccines! Oy vey,oy vah, oy veh, right? 🙂 Let’s continue.

The last segment was about Edward Jenner and his innovative idea for vaccines. We can look further into him, but he isn’t the only one who decided to go with the vaccine narrative. We can break it down vaccine by vaccine and who invented which one, but that seems rather tedious. But if I must, I will, as it is very important to know who did what and why.

So there you have Gandhi’s observational fact, or opinion if you so choose.

Later we will continue with other notations/observations of how this practice of vaccines is nothing more than a cash cow for those who make them.

For now, consider this approach by Gandhi and think for yourself what it could mean to you.

Farewell for now, FREETHINKERS. I shall leave you to your thoughts.

HELLO FREE THINKERS


Welcome! You are about to embark on a journey that will free your mind from the toxicity of a one-sided environment.

We will give you thought-provoking opinions, viewpoints, comments, insights, and perspectives from various walks of life and ages.

Our aim is not only to show different viewpoints but also to spark curiosity. We strive to inspire deeper discussions that can enrich your understanding of the topics at hand, in hopes that it will encourage critical thinking

Thank you for joining the journey and freeing your mind.


Since my last few chapters were not happy for most, I will continue with very controversial topics. Why? Because too many are just rolling over and accepting the narrative without question. So, with that being said, I am going to write about, oh wait for it, that dreaded topic…vaccines! Oooh, me oh my, what will people think? Oh, wait, that’s the point, ”to think”.

Well, where to begin. Ah, yes, the way back history machine of how they all began. Did it all begin with Edward Jenner (1749-1823) in 1796? He was an English scientist and physician after all. But was he even a real scientist?

Jenner was an active Freemason (serving in 1812 as master of the Royal Lodges of Faith and Friendship, NO 270) and Philosopher. Originally trained as a surgeon, Jenner’s interest in natural science led him to study under prominent figures, including the renowned surgeon John Hunter.

At age 13, he became an apprentice to Daniel Ludlow, a competent surgeon trained in London. Jenner studied books on anatomy, helped with simple operations, and participated in dissecting animals to improve his knowledge of anatomy.

At 18, Jenner had acquired enough skills to help him assist Ludlow in more complicated surgeries and to attend to and treat patients by himself.

In 1770, he went to London to study with the most prominent surgeon, John Hunter. Jenner studied anatomy and surgery with Hunter at St George’s Hospital for 2 years and helped him with dissection.

In 1771, he was asked to accompany Captain James Cook as a naturalist but declined the offer and returned to Gloucestershire in 1772, where he assumed the duties of a country doctor instead.

While still practising with his medical interests, Jenner continued his observations of nature by contributing to the natural science literature.

In 1785, Jenner observed that his old friend and teacher, John Hunter, exhibited all the symptoms of progressive angina (angina was considered incurable at that time). In 1793, Hunter passed away from ossification of the coronary arteries of the heart. Soon after his friend’s death, Jenner returned to Gloucestershire and began his medical career.

During his time as a medical practitioner, Jenner began the observations and experimentations that would lead to the discovery, some twenty-five years later, of the principle of vaccination.

However, the principle of inoculation goes further back to ancient times in India and China. They would introduce matter from the pustules of a person with an active case of smallpox into the skin of a person to be immunized from the disease. Then the person who was inoculated would usually contract a milder case of smallpox. At least that was the theory behind a vaccine. However, the inoculation, often performed on children, resulted in death.

Knowing this, Jenner moved forward with practising vaccination on his child many times over, resulting in the child being ill for life. He then inoculated eight-year-old James Phipps on May 14, 1796, with cowpox serum using material obtained from a pustule on the hand of a milkmaid who had contracted cowpox, without success.

Contrary to this horrific practice, they knew how to cure smallpox in the 17th century. The famous Dr. Thomas Sydenham, of England(1624-89), developed a new treatment that reduced the death rate from about 50 percent to 1 percent or 2 percent.

According to Abram Hoffer, MD, PhD, “I don’t think there’s been any major shift in the medical profession’s general approach to new ideas. I don’t think there ever will be that kind of wholesale change. Three hundred years ago, when the major disease was smallpox, Sir Thomas Sydenham developed a new treatment that reduced the death rate from about 50 percent to 1 percent or 2 percent. His reward? He was being challenged to a duel. The English Medical Association wanted to drive him out. He wrote: “A new idea is like a sapling in the middle of a road, and if it’s not fenced in, it will be galloped over by the trampling hordes.” That’s a really great statement, and it’s also my view of what happens to medical discovery.”


Thanks for choosing to be a Free thinker.